Kaushalya Devi v. The state of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
2.
The state of Bihar The Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna through its Chairman The Vice Chairman, Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna ------ Respondents ====
For the petitioner: Mr. Kamal Nayan Choubey Senior Advocate For Respondents: Mr.Sanjay Prakash (P.R.D.A.) For the State: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar,S.C.6 Verma, Advocate ==== P R E S E N T THE HON ’BLE MR JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J., The petitioner is seeking enforcement of a right in terms of registered agreement entered between the erstwhile Patna Regional Development Authority which has been brought on record as contained annexure-1. Since it was a concluded agreement breach alleged against respondents can only be enforced in terms of agreement for which the petitioner has remedy under common law by approaching a court of competent civil jurisdiction. 2 This court is not willing to exercise discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 4.12.2008 AI/NAFR
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.