Sonu Gupta @ Sonu Sah @ Bishwajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 399, 402, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Arms Act, 1959
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 20, 22, 24
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 437(3)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr. Raghav Prasad, Adv. Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ORAL ORDER 2 07-06-2023 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tr. No. 43 of 2022 arising out of Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 194 of 2022 lodged under Sections 399/ 402/ 414/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 25(1-b)a/ 26/ 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 20/ 22/ 24 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
As per the prosecution case, the present case has been filed against seven named accused persons including the petitioner. From the allegation, it transpires that total recovery of 1.601 kg Charas has been made, which is the subject matter of the present case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27985 of 2023(2) dt.07-06-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that from the contents of the F.I.R., it transpires that total three accused persons were apprehended from the place of occurrence. Petitioner has not been apprehended from the place of occurrence rather his name has come in this case by virtue of the confessional statement of the apprehended persons.
Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since
22.10.2022. He also submits that one criminal case is pending against the petitioner in which he is on bail. He further submits that all the three apprehended accused persons have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.02.2023, 18.05.2023 and 30.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64427 of 2022, Cr. Misc. No. 21479 of 2023 and Cr. Misc. No. 20724 of 2023 respectively.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Tr. No. 43 of 2022 arising out of Manjhagarh Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27985 of 2023(2) dt.07-06-2023 P.S. Case No. 194 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions: A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bond. B. One of the bailors shall be close relative who shall file affidavit before the court about his relationship with the petitioner. C. The petitioner shall file an affidavit at the time of furnishing of bail bond that he shall not involve in such criminal activity during the continuance of present bail bond, violation of this condition shall be resulted into cancellation of his present bail bond. allowed.
With this observation, the bail application stands sadique/- U T (Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.