ABHIMANYU SINGH v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHANDRA PRAKASH
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120B, 302
- Arms Act, 1959
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. The application stands allowed. atul/- U…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr.Prateek Tandon Mr.A.G ORAL ORDER 2 31-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 302, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that two unknown miscreants boarded on motorcycle started firing on the son of the informant indiscriminately and due to which his son sustained four pellet injuries and became injured and fell down on the ground. The informant’s son died on the way to hospital. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26859 of 2022(2) dt.31-08-2022 possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of co-accused Ajay Kumar. The petitioner is also accused in six other criminal cases which are not related to murder. The petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Learned counsel for the informant Shri Deepak Kumar have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 386 of
Operative part
The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. The application stands allowed. atul/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 120B, 302; Arms Act, 1959.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.