AVINASH KUMAR YADAV @ AVINASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120B, 406, 420
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the submission made by the learned APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar). Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26914 of…
Judgment
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA 2 16-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ORAL ORDER APP for the State.
The learned counsel for the submits that petitioner seek anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 120B and 34 of the IPC. It is further submitted that investigation of the case is still pending.
The learned APP submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of less than seven years. The said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Operative part
In view of the submission made by the learned APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar). Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26914 of 2024(2) dt.16-05-2024
The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 within a period of three weeks from today and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar). (Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 120B, 406, 420.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.