✦ Patna High Court

Indrani Roy @ Indrani Devi v. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ application is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Executive Engineer, Building Division, Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate Mr. Akash Raj, AC to GA-5 : : 3 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for…

Judgment

Judgment

#1. Versus The State of Bihar through Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

#2. D.D.C. -cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

#3. District Engineer, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi.

#4. Executive Engineer, Building Division, Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate Mr. Akash Raj, AC to GA-5 : : 3 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ORAL ORDER counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of the Zila Parishad. By order dated 23.03.2023, the petitioner was directed to bring on record the payments which she had made towards maintenance of the house which was allotted to her by virtue of her post. The order dated 23.03.2023 clearly recorded that if the petitioner had spent any amount on furnishing the house in question then definitely the payments would have been made to the contractor by cheques or to the shopkeepers from whom she might have purchased any articles. Patna High Court CWJC No.793 of 2018(3) dt.26-04-2023 The order dated 23.03.2023 also recorded that in order for petitioner to succeed, first she will have to establish that she had spent the amounts towards maintenance of the house in which she was staying by valid means. Today when the matter is taken up, no affidavit on behalf of the petitioner has been filed, but the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had spent the entire amount which she is seeking in the present writ application by cash. The Court is not impressed. The writ application is dismissed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 793 of 2018). ← Search more judgments