Roshan Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 380, 436, 457
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 437(3)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ORAL ORDER 3 28-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.882 of 2023 lodged under Sections 457, 380, 436 and 34 of the I.P.C.
As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner and one another against whom there is allegation that they have broken the gate of the informant and committed theft of ornaments amounting to Rs.10 lacs, relevant documents and cash of Rs.20,000/- also.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that though the petitioner was alleged to be identified in CCTV camera, but even then neither any articles has been recovered Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27174 of 2024(3) dt.28-05-2024 from him nor he was put on T.I.P.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2023 having clean antecedent.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has been identified in the CCTV camera.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail, but only after framing of charge, if not framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran, Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.882 of 2023, subject to the following conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.