Randhir Kumar @ Dabloo Kumar v. The District Magistrate-Cum-District Election Officer Panchayat Election, Nalanda at Biharsharif
Case at a glance
- Bench
- G ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In spite of posting the matter as a last indulgence, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amandeep/- U
Judgment
3. District Panchayat Raj Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
4. In Charge Officer, Vehicle Cell, Panchayat Election, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif.
5. District Transport Officer, Nanalda at Biharsharif. ... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY None Mr.Kumar Alok- Sc7 : : 3 16-07-2025
There was no representation for the ORAL ORDER petitioner on 11.07.2025 and the matter was directed to be listed on today, i.e., 16.07.2025.
However, the Learned counsel for the respondents reported to the Court that the payment has already been made and nothing remains in the matter for adjudication.
Operative part
In spite of posting the matter as a last indulgence, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amandeep/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.