✦ Patna High Court

Raj Mohan Pathak v. The Food And Consumer Protection Department

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 10301 of 2017G ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

Case at a glance

Bench
G ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

Outcome

Withdrawn

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Permission is granted. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. amitkr/- U (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

Judgment

5. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s : : : : :

Mr.Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Alka Singh, Advocate Mr.Sanjay Parasmani, AC to GP-4 Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Utkarsha Utpal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 07-05-2025

1.

The Learned counsel Smt. Alka Singh, appearing on behalf of arguing counsel, Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, for the petitioner, submits that she intends to withdraw the Writ petition.

Operative part

2.

Permission is granted. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. amitkr/- U (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 10301 of 2017). ← Search more judgments