Ravindra Prasad Yadav @ Milan Prasad @ Milan Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 ss. 30(a)(d), 41
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ORAL ORDER 2 11-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 288 of 2021, registered on
13.06.2021, for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) (d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,
As per the prosecution, total recovery of 75 litres of illicit country made liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the present case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather, the recovery has been made from a strange Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8136 of 2025(2) dt.11-04-2025 place. Counsel also submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
In the present facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Judge- II, Nawada, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 288 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.