Yogendra Chaudahry @ Yogindra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 201, 304(B)
Judgment
Mr. Shambhu Prasad Yadav Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ORAL ORDER 2 26-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.08.2021, he is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that his sister was married to Dharmendra Yadav in the Year 2015 and after marriage, the family members of the husband including the petitioner were demanding a buffalo and thus, alleges that his sister along with minor daughter had committed suicide at railway track. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3120 of 2022(2) dt.26-05-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. It is next submitted that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased and the husband, who was in custody since 06.06.2019 was granted bail by the learned Court below itself. It is next submitted that co-accused Nilam Devi has been granted bail by
Operative part
25.03.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.63041 of 2021. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, he is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Pachrukhi P. S. Case No.135 of 2019. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 201, 304(B).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.