Janapareddi Jaganmohan Rao & Ors. v. K UDAYA SRI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Judgment
Cause title
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45337/2017 Between: Janapareddi Jaganmohan Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
Lingam Sriramulu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
AND Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM 2. The Court made the following: 2 RNT, J & MRK, J WP No.45337 of 2017 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON’BL SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No. 45337 of 2017
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 19.03.2025 the following order has been passed: “Pursuant to the order dated 16.10.2023, the office has submitted the report.
Sri Balasubrahmanyam, learned counsel is appearing only for respondent Nos.3, 4, 6, 15, 18 & 21.
No representation for the petitioners.
The names of the counsels for the rest of respondents are not provided.
The office should clearly indicate whether the other respondents have engaged counsels. If they have engaged, the names of the counsels should be shown in the Cause List.
Post on 02.04.2025.”
2. Office submitted report stating that except respondents No.3, 4, 6, 15, 18 & 21, rest of the respondents have not engaged any counsels.
3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners.
Operative part
4. Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. _______________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 02.04.2025 Dsr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Apr 2025. The bench was RAVI NATH TILHARI, MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.