SOMANDHEPALLI PRAVEENA v. T ANAND KUMAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication and the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 31.03.2026 ANS ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4069/2025 Between:
1. SOMANDHEPALLI PRAVEENA,, W/O G. PRAKASH REDDY, AGED 42 YEARS, RIO. PAAPIREDDY PALLE VILLAGE, BUDILI POST, GORANTLA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. - 522 601 ...PETITIONER
AND
1. T ANAND KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. - 515110
2. G VENKATESU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE TAHSILDAR, PETITIONER, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT - 515 341 WORKING AS ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for his willful disobedience of Order dated 15.09.2025 passed in W.P.No.24883/2025 on the file of this Hon'ble Court 2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4069/2025
ORDER:
This Court, vide order dated 15.09.2025, disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application bearing No.MUT250215055870, dated 15.02.2025, and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
For non compliance of the said order, the present contempt case is filed.
Pending consideration of the present contempt case, the respondents have complied with the order of this Court vide proceedings Rc.No.101/2025/A, dated 09.01.2026. The said proceedings have placed on record.
Therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication and the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date: 31.03.2026 ANS ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4069/2025 Date: 31.03.2026 ANS
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Mar 2026. The bench was TARLADA RAJASEKHAR, TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.