SRILAKSHMI v. G SAI PRASAD
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2613/2025 Between:
1. SRILAKSHMI CONSTRUCTIONS, MP KOVVURI NAGIREDDY, S/O. KOVVURI VENKATA REDDY, R/O. DOOR NO.8-2119, BURUGU PUNTHA, RAVULAPALEM, RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533 238 ...PETITIONER
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD GOVERNMENT RESOURCES BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, DEPARTMENT,
2. SRI D K BALAJI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU.
3. SRI CH DEVA PRAKASH, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST ::2:: GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. SRI M DAKSHINA MURTHY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, G.W DIVISION NIDADAVOLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempt's of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 36839/2022 dated 06.12.2023 by Learned Single Judge and to Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R
2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.C.No.2613 of 2025 This Court made the following
ORDER:
As learned counsel respondents filed written instructions dated 27.01.2026 stating that the orders of this Court have been complied with, the matter was passed over after lunch for confirmation or instructions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even after lunch, there is no representation for the petitioner.
In view of compliance reported vide written instructions dated 27.01.2026 furnished by Respondent No.4, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J _________________________________
30.03.2026 Krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 93
30.03.2026 C.C.No.2613 of 2025
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 30 Mar 2026. The bench was VENKATESWARLU, VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.