ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT v. ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 175
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous…
Judgment
Cause title
SRI AYYAPPA SEVA SAMAJAM, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT N.V.NANDA KUMAR @ NANDA KUMAR CHERUVU KATTA, OLD TOWN, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER
AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.K.SAMUDRAM URBAN POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL SUB-DIVISION ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. SAKE RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.SAKE SREERAMULU, R/O.H.NO.7/47, ANANTHAPUR, BUKKARAYASAMUDHRAM, REKULAKUNTA, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
6. BATHYALA KESAVA, S/O.B.ANJINEYULU, R/O.H.NO.20/301, AMBARAPU STREET, OLD TOWN, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
7. PASUPULETI GOPAL, S/O.P.VENKATARAMUDU, R/O.H.NO.17-1- 993, VENUGOPAL NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
8. K KOYAGURA AMARNATH REDDY, S/O.K.JAYARAMI REDDY, R/O.H.NO.6-623-16, AZAD NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
9. U VENKATA PRASAD, R/O.H.NO.18-584, NEERUGANTI STREET, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
10. PUTLURU GAJENDRA MOHAN, S/O.PUTIURU BALANGANNA TOWN, AMBARAPU STREET, OLD R/O.H.NO.20/332, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
11. P VENKATA NAIDU, S/O.NARAYANA SWAMY, R/O.H.NO.1-9, OC ANANTHAPUR, BONALAWAA, NARPALA, COLONY, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2
12. M ANJANA MURTHY, S/O.M.CHENNAIAH, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, BACKSIDE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. R/O.H.NO.28-7-97, RAJEEV CHILDREN PACK
13. G SUNKANNA, S/O.SANJEEVARAYUDU, R/O.H.NO.19-2-438, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR ...RESPONDENT(S)
: RANINAGAR, OLD TOWN, DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y BHANUSRI AKHILA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents No.1 and 2 in not registering the FIR in pursuant to the Complaint dated 30-11-2025 made by the Petitioner and not arranging the necessary Police Bandobast in the premises of Sri Ayyappa Swamy Temple, Bukkaraya Samudram, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District till 15-01-2026 in the current Mandala Deeksha season as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to Sec. 175 of BNSS and consequently direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to register the FIR in pursuant to the Complaint dated 30-11-2025 made by Respondents No.5 to 13 and others and also arrange necessary Police Bandobast in the premises of Sri Ayyappa Swamy Temple, Bukkaraya Samudram, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District till 15-01-2026 to prevent the Respondents No.5 to 13 and others from causing nuisance in the interest of justice.
the Petitioner against
Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police have not registered any crime on the complaint given by the Petitioner in this matter, since their preliminary enquiry reveals that there is a civil suit in O.S.No.76 of 2023 pending between the parties, wherein, the Court ordered status quo. It is further submitted that the matter is purely civil in nature and as such, the Police have not registered any crime. 3
Ms.Y.Bhanusri Akhila, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date:02.01.2026 Dinesh ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35562 of 2025 Dt.02.01.2026 Dinesh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 175.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Jan 2026. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.