MALAGELI HANUMANTHU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date: 05.08.2025 Asr __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA…
Judgment
#1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
#1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ Order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting the investigation relating to FIR No.103/ 2024 Dated 09/11/2024 on the file of Kasapuram Police Station U/s 126(2) 118(1) r/w 35 BNS as illegal arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Article 14 16 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 to complete respondents in Crime No. 103/2024 Dated 09/11/2024 on the file of Kasapuram Police Station U/s 1262, 1181 r/w 35 BNS” investigation
#2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
#3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that police after conducting investigation in the present crime filed charge sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntakal.
#4. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date: 05.08.2025 Asr __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20215 of 2025 Dt.05.08.2025 Asr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 05 Aug 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.