Konidala Sai Subrahmanyam v. The State Of A P & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 21, 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date:16.04.2025 UPS 3 26 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32240 of 2018 Dated.16.04.2025 UPS
Judgment
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
VAKA KRANTHI SRI The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32240 of 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue appropriate orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent issued the Impugned Proceeding bearing Rc. No. 568/A7/SSA/2018 dated
18.06.2018 to the petitioner for removed from the service of the Cluster Resource Person, Venkatagiri is illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the proceeding bearing Rc. No. 568/A7/SSA/2018 dated 18.06.2018 and violation of the article 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violation of principles natural justice and violation of basic human rights and consequently praying this Hon’ble Court to direct the respondents reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith with all benefits from the date of suspension and pass…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.V. Venkata Ravi Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the instructions of the Petitioner, they intend to withdraw the petition.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education on behalf of the respondents is in attendance.
Operative part
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date:16.04.2025 UPS 3 26 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32240 of 2018 Dated.16.04.2025 UPS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Apr 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.