SAATVIK ENGINEERING WPRS v. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3510/2025 Between:
1. SAATVIK ENGINEERING WPRS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER BUTU GOWRINAIDU, S/O.BUTU LAXMI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 1-82-11 LIG-117 GF, SECTOR 3, MVP COLONY, (PO), VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. LB COLONY ...PETITIONER
AND
1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI KETAN GARG GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. IAS, COMMISSIONER, ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Hon hie High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 22.09.2025 passed in WP No.25903 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with filing of the Certified Copies of Orders of this Hon hie Court dated 22.09.2025 passed in WP No.25903 of 2024 and pass HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by respondents.
In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Date:17.04.2026 NKA ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 270 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N HN, J C.C.No.3510_2025 CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3510 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026 NKA
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Apr 2026. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.