PALLAPU VENKATESWARALU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 10 Dec 2025
- Bench
- VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Outcome
Disposed of
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in a case where CC.No.441 of 2021 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge Court, Vinukonda, is pending for consideration. There shall be no…
Judgment
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
.... to issue an appropiate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 in not taking any action against the Respondent No.4 who are interfering in cheque bounce case 2 between the petitioner and 5th Respondent in CC.No. 441 of 2021 pending on the file of the court of the Junior civil Judge court, Vinukonda, Palnadu District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere in cheque bounce case between the petitioner and 5th Respondent in CC.No. 441 of 2021 pending on the file of the court of the Junior civil Judge court, Vinukonda, Palnadu District
Heard Sri Shaik Meeravali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the police not to interfere in cheque bounce case between the petitioner and unofficial respondents.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in a case where CC.No.441 of 2021 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge Court, Vinukonda, is pending for consideration. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date:10.12.2025 Asr ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31281 of 2023 Dt.10.12.2025 Asr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Dec 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.