SMT.GIRI ARUNA v. KORUMUTIA RAJA
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 04 Feb 2026
- Bench
- RAVI NATH TILHARI, MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Outcome
Withdrawn
Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Dated: 04.02.2026 AG ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2026 In/and
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 733/2025 Between:
1. SMT.GIRI ARUNA, W/O W/0 KORNUTIA RAJA, D/O G.NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.H.NO.8130, MYSURIVARIPALII VILLAGE,RAILWAY KODURU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,A P STATE. ...APPELLANT
AND
1. KORUMUTIA RAJA, S/o Venkataiah, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Coolie R/o Jangitivaripalli, Haijanawada, Railway Koduru Mandal, Annamayya District A P State.PIN-516101. ...RESPONDENT
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersPleased to allow the Appeal by setting aside the order and Decree dated 28.08.2025 passed in HMOP.No.91 OF 2023 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajampet and consequently Dismiss the above said HMOP IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the decree and order passed in HMOP.No.91 OF 2023 on the file of the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rajampet, dated.28.08.2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dismiss the above CMA No. 733/2025 as no further orders are necessary in view of permanent settlement arrived at by the parties herein in National Lok Adalath Bench - Mandal Legal Services Authority, Rajampet dated 13.12.2025 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. B S REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. A SREEDHAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2026 In/and
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 733/2025
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 19.01.2026, the following order was passed: “Sri B.S.Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant through virtual mode, submits that the matter has been settled out of court between the parties by the award of the Lok Adalat. However, he prays for time to bring on record the copy of the award along with the appropriate application for disposal of the present appeal.
Sri A.Sreedhar, learned counsel for the respondent, also submits the same.
List after two weeks.”
2. A copy of the Lok-Adalat award dated 13.12.2025 has been brought on record by learned counsel for the respondent through I.A.No.1 of 2026 with the request to dismiss the appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant appearing through virtual mode also submits that the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
Operative part
In view of the above, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Dated: 04.02.2026 AG ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 152 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.1 of 2026 In/and CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 733/2025 Dated: 04.02.2026 AG
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Feb 2026. The bench was RAVI NATH TILHARI, MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.