✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 21 Aug 2025

SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUM LAND ACQUISITION v. P RAMBHUPAL REDDY

NINALA JAYASURYA, TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Case at a glance

Decided
21 Aug 2025
Bench
NINALA JAYASURYA, TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the same and for the reasons alike, the present batch of appeals are liable to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Judgment

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 263, 278, 282, 286, 314 of 2017 LAAS No.263 of 2017: Between:

1. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, TELUGUGANGA PROJECT, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND

1. P RAMBHUPAL REDDY, S/o.Rosi Reddy R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:

1. GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent:

1.

BALLA RAVINDRANATH & SAVITHRI DEVI 2 The Court made the following Common Judgment: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) The present batch of appeals have been filed against a common order dated 21.01.2016 in L.A.O.P.Nos.351, 350, 349, 347 and 348 of 2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District.

2.

Heard Sri T.S.Rayulu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. Also heard Smt. Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents, who appeared through online.

3.

At the time of considering the appeals, it is noted that, in respect of the acquisition of lands in Mandaluru Village for the purpose of excavation of 46R Minor Distributory in Block No.21 of Telugu Ganga Project, a batch of appeals came up for consideration before a co-ordinate bench of this Court and after detailed consideration, vide orders dated 10.07.2025 L.A.A.S.No.409 of 2016 and batch, the market value of Rs.1,00,000/- per acre, as fixed by the Reference Court, was not interfered with.

4.

In view of the same and for the reasons alike, the present batch of appeals are liable to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

5.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in these cases, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ______________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J Date : 21.08.2025 BMS

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments