Boya Madhu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through Station House Officer

KodumurPolice Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati. ...Respondent petition under section 438 of Cr.P.C (Under Section 528 of BNSS, act) is felled praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of criminal Petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO enlarge the petitioner/A12 on Anticipatory Bail in the event Of arrest in connection With crime no.81 of 2025 27.04.2025 registered before Kodumur Pol-lee Station, a // // / // 4 >-9 < a-, Kurnool District; The pet'ltion coming On for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri p.Narasimhulu, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following; J±_lOurt Made the Fol[owinq OrcT±e±±= The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/A12 to grant antiCiPatOry bail in connection with crime No.81 of 2025 of Kodumur Police Station, Kurnool District, registered for the Offenses ®PuniShable under Sections 115(2),118(1) and 351(2) read with 3(5)of the BNS. f\

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 27.04.2025, the defacto complainant filed a report before the police stating that he, along with his family members and other village elders, were goI'ng tO the accused to settle the problem of his cousin suresh, wherein Al to A8 and some others were r,olding sticks and rods and coming towards the defacto complainant and showed their hands at them, threatened them and attacked them and beat them. Al beat the defacto complainant with a stick on hI'S head and caused bleeding injury and A2 beat the defacto complainant with an iron rod and caused bleeding injury on the left arm. When the cousl'n of the defacto complainant intervened, the accused also beat him and caused bleeding injury on his head, and dumb injury on his left arm, and they also beat the uncle of the defacto complainant and caused bleeding injury on his head. I --`` \\

Heard learned counsel for the petitI-Oner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent/state. perused the record.

A perusal of the material on record goes to showthat basing on the confessional statement of A1, name of the petitioner herein/A12 is shown as accused in the present crime. Even according to the confessional statement, except mentioning that the petitioner was Present at the scene Of Offence, nO specific overt act has been attributed as against the petitioner herein. I -F4' (>

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and since no specific overt act has been attributed as against the petitioner herein, this Court is inclined to consider request of petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, in the event of hI-S arrest in the above Crime, the petitioner herein shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e., on every Sunday between 10.00 A.M. and 01.00 P.M., till filing of charge sheet.

The Station H,ouse Officer, Kodumur Police Station, KurnooI District.

2. One CC to Sri. P.Narasimhulu, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 4. One spare copy -\l\I HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.5482 of 2025 ALLOWED "*` l . b'_rty 'wi TtFtlF ~@#i ¥ %C\AL c`iel 8B JuLZO25 =-