Veeravalli Sudheer v. The State Of Andhra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition iS allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition iS allowed. effs3€ __ __-----,-------+ _--------- sD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTAN EGISTRAR bF-FICER /?, I/\ y__fy-.-I.--,,y=ul //TRUE COPY// Ou_ To'1. The Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru.
Judgment
Cause title
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. Respondent/Complainant petition under section sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.a, [New Sections 480 and 483 of BNSS, 2023] is filed praying that in the Circumstances Stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner/All on Cr.No. 316/2024 under section 8© r/w 20(b)(ii)(B)&29 of NDPS Act 1985 on the file Of the Mogaltur Police Station, West Godavari District, dated 09-12-2024. The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof\ and upon hearing the arguments of sri KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Advocate for the petitioner and of puBLIC' PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the Court inade the following [3327] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY £B!ng±LNAL PEI±±!gD!l!Qi29 OF 2Q25 Betwee n = Veeravalli Sudheer ...PETITIONER
/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANT Pradesh counsel for the petitioner/accused:
1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant:
1. PUBLIC P_ROSECUTOR The Court made the following
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, und_er Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by ¢ I the petitioner/All, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.316 of 2024 of Mogaltur Police Station, We§.t Godavari diStr'lCt.
A case has been registered against the petl|tl-oner herein and others for the offence punl'shable under section 8(c) read wI'th 20(b)(Ii)(B), 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropl'c substances Act, 1985 (for sh6rf 'the NDPS ActJ).
case of the prosecution, ln brI'ef, IS that, on 09.122024, on receipt of credI'ble ,|nformatI-On, the Sub-Inspector of poll'ce, Mogaltur poIICe Statlon, along with hls staff and mediators, reached the open place, situated at front sI|de of Manj Lohl-tha vaishnavi dining haH opposite to Goddess BandI' Mutyalamma Temple, MutyalapallI- Village, Mogaltur Mandal and found A2 to All l'n possess, Ion of 138 Grams and 198 milll'grams of hash oil. A2 to All confessed that they procured the same from A1. The contraband was sel-zed under cover of a mediators report and a case has been registered aga,'nst the accused.
Heard. perusedtherecord.
The petitioner/Ail was arrested on o9.12.2024 and since then he is I'n judicial custody. The quantl'ty of contraband allegedly seized from the possessl'on of accused l's not a commercl'al quantity. lt is subml-tted by the learned Assl'stant Publl'c prosecutor that major portl-on of invest!gatl'on l's completed.
ln View Of the aforesaid facts and Circumstances Of the case, this _court 'ls inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/All, on - the follow'lng conditions. i) The petitioner/All shall be released On ba" On his executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) With two Sureties Of the like Sum each tO the satisfaction of the learned special Judge for trial Of Cases under the NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari district, at Eluru. -.+. ii) on release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House Offllcer COnCerned, Once in a Week i.e., On every i1.,'i2 saturday between 10.00 am and 01.00 pm, I-Ill filing Of the charge sheet.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition iS allowed. effs3€ __ __-----,-------+ _--------- sD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTAN EGISTRAR bF-FICER /?, I/\ y__fy-.-I.--,,y=ul //TRUE COPY// Ou_ To'1. The Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-Gum-I Additional sessions Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru.
2. The Superintendent, Central Jail, RajamahendraVaram. 3. The Station House Offilcer, Mogaltur Police Stat',on, West Godavari. 4. One CC to SRl. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, H'lgh Court Of Andhra PradeSh. [OUT]
6. One spare COPY ER HIGH COURT SRK, J DATED:09/01/2O25 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.29 of 2025 ALLOWED ~~..,. *,,,,,I rf©±*'€"IT*~r~~~___Dm_.__"__.~__ 1 n ,lB.)i ?fl?5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Criminal Petition iS allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 480, 483; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Jan 2025. The bench was K SREENIVASA R, K SREENIVASA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.