A.v.s. Ramesh Chandran v. State Of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J
Judgment
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15889/2017 Between: A.v.s. Ramesh Chandran, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Telangana Represented By Its Principal and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR AGRICULTURE (TG)
T S PRAVEEN KUMAR The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the proceedings HRD/NEW Plant. Aspt/3333/13/1590, dt. 07.10.2016 issued by the Second Respondent as arbitrary, 2 illegal, discriminatory, unconstitutional and void and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents to forthwith pass final orders in pursuance of the show cause notice/charge memo issued by the 4th Respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case....
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Karunakar, learned counsel representing Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Operative part
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J
31.10.2025. Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.15889 of 2017
31.10.2025 Asr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Oct 2025. The bench was MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.