MALAPATI LEELA VATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date:27.04.2026 GK _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11405 of 2026 Dated:27.04.2026 GK
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11405/2026 Between:
#1. MALAPATI LEELA VATHI, W/O G. RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,WORKING AS MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD. (DCCB), KANCHIKACHERLA BRANCH, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
#1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
#2. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD DCCB, , REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DR. YSR SAHAKARA BHAVAN, JAGANADHAPURAM, HEAD OFFICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the 2 High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025- 26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent transferring the petitioner from Kanchikacherla Branch to Vatsavai Branch as Manager as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the transfer policy/guidelines, and consequently set aside the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025- 26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Manager at the District Cooperative Central Bank, Kanchikacherla Branch, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 praying Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pieased to suspend the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025-26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent n and consequently permit the petitioner to continue at Kanchikacherla Branch as Manager, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
#1. K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
#1. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
#2. Permission is accorded. 3
#3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Date:27.04.2026 GK _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11405 of 2026 Dated:27.04.2026 GK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 07 Apr 2026. The bench was D RAMESH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.