M Satyanarayana v. The State Of Ap & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19, 21, 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 8852 of 2019
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Respondent(S): ...PETITIONER
RESPONDENT(S)
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. M S R CHANDRA MURTHY The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
.... to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in nature of Mandamus by declaring the action things and deeds of Respondents in confirming the removal orders of Petitioner from the post of Field Assistant by Proceedings in H.R.No.15/EGS/DWAMA/2015 dated 25.08.2018 issued by 3rd Respondent which is illegal, irregular, contra to the disciplinary rules issued by the Director, EGS Rural Development, Hyderabad and in valuation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner in the post of Field Assistant K.A.Mallavaram Village, Kota Nanduru Mandal, East Godavari.
Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Special Standing Counsel for MGNREGS appearing for respondents would submit that during pendency of this Writ Petition, by virtue of the Order dated 09.06.2023 issued by the respondent 2 authorities, Petitioner was appointed as Field Assistant. A copy of the said letter is placed on record. Hence, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, the Writ Petition may be disposed of.
Operative part
In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 8852 of 2019
26.03.2025 Mjl /*
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 26 Mar 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.