✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 23 Oct 2025

BANDLA SHIVAIAH v. BOGGAVARAPU MASTANAIAH DIED PER LRS AND 4 OTHERS

SUMATHI JAGADAM

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

3. BANDLA SAIDAMMA, W/O. SRINIVAS, D/O. BOGGAVARAPU MASTANAIAH R/O. JANAPADU VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. CHUNDURU NAARSAMMA, W/O. D/O. BOGGAVARAPU MASTANAIAH, R/O. PETASANNIGANDLA VILLAGE, KARAMPUDI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SANKARAIAH,

5. DAVULURI SAMRAJYAM, W/O. BOGGAVARAPU MASTANAIAH, R/O. KARAMPUDI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. VENKATESWARLU, D/O. KAKANIVARIPALEM, IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 666 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ...RESPONDENT(S)

: 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.354/2014 bring the LRs of the deceased 1st Respondent on record as Respondents 2 to 5 in the present appeal Counsel for the Appellant:

1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RAJA REDDY KONETI The Court made the following: 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.354/2014

JUDGMENT:

Operative part

The matter was adjourned from 29.08.2025 to 25.09.2025 at request of learned counsel for the appellant. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 4 JS,J C.M.A.No.354/2014 732 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 354/2014 Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS 5 JS,J C.M.A.No.354/2014

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Oct 2025. The bench was SUMATHI JAGADAM.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments