VIJAYAWADA-3, KRISHNA DISTRICT v. STREET, GANGANAMMAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

Cause title

1. UPPULURI MARUTHI SRINIVAS, S/O.LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, R/O.DEVINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, VIJAYAWADA-3, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER APPEALS, O/O THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR REVENUE DIVISION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. THE TAHSIIDHAR, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

6. THE A P CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AMRAVATHI, LENIN CENTER, NEAR ELURU ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

7. THE SUBREGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB-REGISTRAR, 2 JS,J W.P.No.30341/2018 MANDADAM MANDAL, AMRAVATHI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

8. PILLALLAMARRI RAMAKRISHNA S/O. PURNANANDA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. 7-3-15, GANGANAMMAPETA TENALI, PILLALAMARIVARI STREET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SOMAYAJULU,

9. PILLALLAMARRI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O. PURNANANDA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. 7-3-15, PILLALAMARIVARI STREET, GANGANAMMAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

10. PILLALLAMARRI LAKSHMINARANAYANA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O. LAKSHMI KANTAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O 7-28-93, ANJANEYA PANTHULU STREET, GANGANAMMAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

11. CHINTALAPATI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. VENKATA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O 6-9-60, JAIN TEMPLE STREET, GANGANAMMAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

12. BHAGAVATHULA SIVA SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. DAKSHANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O 6-5-12, CHUNDURUVARI STREET, GANGANAMMAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S)

: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in CCLA's Ref. No.Settle II(1)/284/2017 dated 01-12-2017 is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and set aside the same and consequently direct the official respondents herein to forthwith release all compensatory benefits as promised for the lands surrendered by the petitioner herein to the 6th respondent herein and pass the Revision petition in entertaining IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CCLA s Ref. No.Settle II(1)/284/2017 3 JS,J W.P.No.30341/2018 dated 01-12-2017 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 01-12-2017 in CCLA's Ref. No.Settle II(1)/284/2017 of the rd respondent herein and consequently direct the. 6th respondent herein to forthwith release all the compensation benefits for the lands handed over by the petitioner pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. S PRANATHI 4 JS,J W.P.No.30341/2018 The Court made the following

ORDER: