✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 23 Apr 2025

Mr Vallabhneni Vamsi Mohan v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Criminal Petition No. 3908 of 2025T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

Case at a glance

Decided
23 Apr 2025
Bench
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Therefore, in view of the above, this Criminal Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 35-3 of the B.N.S.S, scrupulously by following the judgment in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar of the…

Judgment

Cause title

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3908/2025 Between: Mr Vallabhneni Vamsi Mohan ...PETITIONER

/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT

/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. V.Devi Satya

Sri Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition u/Sec.482 of B.N.S.S. is filed seeking to enlarge the petitioner/A1 on anticipatory bail in Crime No.81/2025 of Gannavaram Urban Police Station, Krishna District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 120b r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’), Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short ‘the MMDARA’) and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (for short ‘the PDPPA’).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General for the State.

3.

At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his request only to order notice under Section 35-3 of B.N.S.S. by following the judgment in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, stating that the aforesaid offences registered against the petitioners are punishable with less than seven years period of imprisonment.

4.

Therefore, in view of the above, this Criminal Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 35-3 of the B.N.S.S, scrupulously by following the judgment in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. ________________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO

23.4.2025 TJN 20 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.3908 OF 2025 TJN Dated 23.4.2025

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 — s. 3.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Apr 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 3908 of 2025). ← Search more judgments