Criminal Petition No. 3947 of 2025 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Judgment
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner herein/A6, seeking anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.146 of 2023 of Cheedikada Police Station, Anakapalli district, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the NDPS Act’).
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to filing of the present Criminal Petition, the petitioner herein was arrested by the police, hence nothing survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous.
Operative part
Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. Date:29.04.2025 Nsr ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. 2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3947 of 2025 Date:29.04.2025 Nsr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Apr 2025. The bench was K SREENIVASA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.