BOYA CHINNA RANGANNA v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDAVARAM POLICE STATION
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 15 Sep 2025
- Bench
- VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Outcome
Disposed of
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date:15.09.2025…
Judgment
Cause title
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. A.LAVANYA, W/O A.SRIRAMULU, YEMMINAGUR KURNOOL DISTRICT R/O T.B.P. COLONY, ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with petitioners land to an extent Ac. 1.13 cents situated in Sy.No.112-A2 of Mugathi village of Nandavaram Mandal, Adoni Revenue Division, Kurnool District without 2 there being any authority to interfere in civil dispute which is violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land to an extent Ac.1.13 cts situated in Sy.No.112-A2 of Mugathi village of Nandavaram Mandal, Adoni Revenue Division, Kurnool District.
Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties.
Sri B.Sarvotham Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit, a direction may be given to the Police not to interfere with the civil disputes between Petitioners and the Respondent No.5.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5353 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Sep 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.