AMBUJALAPU VARAHALUBABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Oct 2025
- Bench
- VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Outcome
Disposed of
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 19, 21, 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. In the event of any crime registered against the petitioner, the police are directed to follow…
Judgment
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
.... to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of wirt of mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police Station at the behest of 4th respondent and threatening to handover his Zeroyatiland admeasuring Ac. -0.30 cents in Sy. Nio. 750 situated at A. V. Nagar, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District without any authority or jurisdiction and thereby causing interference in the civil matters, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, 2 unconstitutional and violative of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent here to take action against the 3rd respondent for interfering in the civil disputes, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Heard Smt S.V.Indira, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties.
Operative part
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. In the event of any crime registered against the petitioner, the police are directed to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Date:06.10.2025 ASR ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1871 of 2021 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 19, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Oct 2025. The bench was VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.