K MADDAIAH v. B RAJASHEKAR IAS
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 188/2024 Between:
1. K MADDAIAH, S/O. K. PEDDA KESANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. N. KOTHALAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
B RAJASHEKAR IAS, S/O. B. SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS OCC. PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
S S RAWAT IAS, S/O. UNKNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCC. SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
SMT ARUNA KUMARI IAS, OCC. THE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PVS EMPIRE, NEAR PATUR CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
DR G SRIJANA IAS, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
SUNKESULA CHINNA ERRA MADDANNA, S/O. S.ERRA BALANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PIU DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, SIO UNKNOWN AGED ABOUT UNKNOWN OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT
KRISHNA TEJA, SIO UNKNOWN AGED ABOUT UNKNOWN OCC THE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PVS EMPIRE NEAR PATUR CROSS ROAD TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT
SRIJANA GUMMALA, DIO UNKNOWN AGED ABOUT UNKNOWN OCC THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KURNOOL DISTRICT RR 6 TO 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT DATED 23 01 2025 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2024 IN CC NO 188 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish Respondents herein for having willful and intentionally disobeyed the orders passed by W.P.No.24911 of 2023 dated 03.10.2023 U/Secs.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass such this Honble Court IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased permit me to implead Respondent No. 6 to 8 as Respondents in C.C.No.188 of 2024 for willful and intentionally disobeying the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.24911 of 2023 dated 03.10.2023 and to punish them U/Secs.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
4. C SUMON The Court made the following order: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of orders dated 03.10.2023 passed by this Court W.P.No.24911/2023. Ms Swathi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the respondent authorities have complied with the orders dated 03.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24911/2023 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. BRS ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 27 Oct 2025. The bench was RAVI CHEEMALAPATI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.