Shaik Reena & Ors. v. MURTHY
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 21, 226
Judgment
Counsel for the Respondent(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SERVICES III 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring “…..to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for the promotion to the post of the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for the promotion to the post of School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natural justice the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natur the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natur guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Urdu/Telugu from respondents to consider the petitioners promotion to the post of School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from respondents to consider the petitioners promotion to the post of School Assistant Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu with all consequential benefits and pass….” Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu with all consequential
#2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has furnished a copy of Proceedings of the District Educational Officer, SPSR Nellore District vide R.C.No.5776/B2/2024, dated 04.01.2025 along with Promotion-Annexure, wherein at Sl.No.1 and Sl.No.4, petitioners herein are promoted. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed by the respondents No.1 and 4 and no further orders are required for adjudication in the present writ petition and hence the same may be closed.
#3. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents does not refute the said submission.
#4. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Date : 10-01-2025 Gvl __________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION No: 689/2025 Date :10.01.2025 Gvl
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Jan 2025. The bench was K MANMADHA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.