K SIVARAMAN & Ors. v. P SATHISHKUMAR & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
the law as noted above, the appeal shall stand dismissed
Provisions considered
- Workman Compensation Amendment Act, 2009
- Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 s. 4
- Prior to Act
- Constitution of India arts. 136, 142
- IV. Prior to Act
- Workmen’s Compensation Act
- Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923
- Finance Act, 2002
- XIV-B to the Finance Act
- Railways Act, 1989
- XIII of the Railways Act
- Workmen Compensation Act
Judgment
appeal was filed by the respondents against the judgment of the High Court enhancing the compensation. In view of this, the award of compensation ordered by the High Court is not interfered with in exercise of the inherent jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution. [Para 34][499-E-F]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the law as noted above, the appeal shall stand dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Workman Compensation Amendment Act, 2009; Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 — s. 4; Prior to Act; Constitution of India — arts. 136, 142; IV. Prior to Act; Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Supreme Court of India, on 18 Jan 2010. The bench was DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Another 1 relationship is under human verification and not counted above.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
Later judgments that treat this case
- Relied on2023_14_374_385