✦ Supreme Court of India

ESHA BHATTACHARJEE v. MANAGING COMMITTEE OF RAGHUNATHPUR NAFAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Ex consequenti, the appeals are allowed and the order

Provisions considered

Judgment

(viii) There is a distinction between inordinate delay and a delay of short duration or few days, for to the former doctrine of prejudice is attracted whereas to the latter it may not be attracted. That apart, the first one warrants strict B c D E F G H ESHA BHATTACHARJEE v. MANAGING COMMIT. OF RAGHUNATHPUR NAFAR ACADEMY 785 approach whereas the second calls for a A liberal delineation. (ix) The conduct, behaviour and attitude of a party relating to its inaction or negligence are relevant factors to be taken into consideration. It is so, as the fundamental principle is that the courts are required to weigh the scale of balance of justice in respect of both parties and the said principle cannot be given a total go by in the name of liberal approach. (x) (xi) If the explanation offered is concocted or the grounds urged in the application are fanciful, the courts should be vigilant not to expose the other side unnecessarily to face such a litigation. It is to be borne in mind that no one gets away with fraud, misrepresentation or interpolation by taking recourse to the technicalities of law of limitation. (xii) The entire gamut of facts are to be carefully scrutinized and the approach should be based on the paradigm of judicial discretion which is founded on objective reasoning and not on individual perception. (xiii) The State or a public body or an entity representing a collective cause should be given some acceptable latitude. [para 15] [797- D-H; 798-A-H; 799-A-C] B c D E F G

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Ex consequenti, the appeals are allowed and the order

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Appeal No. 8183-8184 of 2013). ← Search more judgments