Indian Penal Code — Section 8
Certain words omitted by Act 40 of 1964, s. 2.
8. Certain words omitted by Act 40 of 1964, s. 2.
105
1*[Eleventh.--Every person who holds any office in virtue of which he is empowered to prepare, publish, maintain or revise an electoral roll or to conduct an election or part of an election;]
2*[Twelfth.--Every person--
(a) in the service or pay of the Government or remunerated by fees or commission for the performance of any public duty by the Government;
(b) in the service or pay of a local authority, a corporation established by or under a Central, Provincial or State Act or a Government company as defined in section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).]
Illustration
A Municipal Commissioner is a public servant.
Explanation 1.--Persons falling under any of the above descriptions are public servants, whether appointed by the Government or not.
Explanation 2.--Wherever the words "public servant" occur, they shall be understood of every person who is in actual possession of the situation of a public servant, whatever legal defect there may be in his right to hold that situation.
3*[Explanation 3.--The word "election" denotes an election for the purpose of selecting members of any legislative, municipal or other public authority, of whatever character, the method of selection to which is by, or under, any law prescribed as by election.]
4* * * * *
22.
"Movable property".
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 8
- Sandeep @ Sandesh Diwanji Chandne v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors
- DWIVEDI v. State Of Chhattisgarh
- Rishabh Berisal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
- Rishabh Berisal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
- Kunjbihari Hathile v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
- Judgment · High Court · 2026
- PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 Mukesh Kumar State of Haryana & Anr. v. CRA-S-2052-2026
- CHINTAM VIJAYABABU ALIAS DUDE v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- CHINTAM VIJAYABABU ALIAS DUDE v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- Surendra Prasad Singh v. Anil Kumar Mishra
- KHURAM PARVEZ v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
- MR.DINESH MALPANI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- SAMIR KUMAAR MODI v. NIRMALA BAGRI
- SAMIR KUMAAR MODI v. NIRMALA BAGRI
- KABIR RANJAN DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM & Ors.
- STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) v. SAGAR @ RAVINDER
- Orissa High Court · 2026
- Judgment · High Court · 2026
- ABUL KASEM v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND & Ors.
- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.