Indian Penal Code — Section 224
Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful
224. Resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension.--Whoever intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself for any offence with which he is charged or of which he has been convicted, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained for any such offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation.-The punishment in this section is in addition to the punishment for which the person to be apprehended or detained in custody was liable for the offence with which he was charged, or of which he was convicted. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 224
- STATE OF GUJARAT v. MULUBHA JIVABHAI DHANDHAL ANR
- ChinnathambiS/o.Aiyannar v. The Director Inspector General of Prison
- Jeyakumar v. The State of Tamilnadu & Ors
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Om Parkash @ Sonu
- Shivaji Satavaji Bhagde v. The State of Maharashtra
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- INDEX v. Lamboo Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Sachidanand Sharma
- Himachal Pradesh High Court · 2026
- Ishyadas Parichhas @ Eshya Das Parichha v. State of Haryana
- Rajendra Kumar Arya v. State of Uttarakhand
- The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Pursad City v. Azhar @ Annu
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- Chandu Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Nitin Kumar Gautam v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Cheif Secy. Home/Prin.Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.