Indian Penal Code — Section 119
Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it
119. Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent.--Whoever, being a public servant intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence which it is his duty as such public servant to prevent,
voluntarily conceals, by any act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design.
if offence be committed.
if offence be committed.--shall, if the offence be committed, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term of such imprisonment, or with such fine as is provided for that offence, or with both;
if offence be punishable with death, etc.
if offence be punishable with death, etc.--or, if the offence be punishable with death or 1*[imprisonment for life], with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years;
if offence be not committed.
if offence be not committed.--or, if the offence be not committed, shall be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence for a term which may extend to one-fourth part of the longest term of such imprisonment or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with both.
Illustration
A, an officer of police, being legally bound to give information of all designs to commit robbery which may come to his knowledge, and knowing that B designs to commit robbery, omits to give such information, with intent to facilitate the commission of that offence. here A has by an illegal omission concealed the existence of B's design and is liable to punishment according to the provision of this section.
120.
Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 119
- Janapriya Si v. Tuni Dhal
- Orissa High Court · 2026
- State Of Chhattisgarh v. Philomina Kerketta
- O KHALID TEKA THRO UMER FARUQ AHMEDHUSEN HAYAT v. STATE OF GUJARAT & Ors.
- Laxmi Devi @ Suman Devi v. The State of Bihar
- PARNAM SINGH ALIAS PANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB
- Ajay Kumar v. State of Punjab
- CRM-M No. 24387 of 2024 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2024
- MR MURUKANNAPPA v. THE STATE BY CHINTAMANI TOWN POLICE STAT
- Smti Kabita Deka, ACS v. The State of Assam & Ors.
- Rule 7.3 ibid was subject matter of consideration v. Shashi Kumar, Civil Appeal No.41
- SRI SHASHIKUMAR N M v. M T KRISHNAPPA
- Debashish Majumdar @ Debasish Majumdar v. The State of Jharkhand
- Jaswinder Singh @ Mika v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Mahesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
- Mannu Ram Goti v. State of Chhattisga
- Kanker} v. State of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate, North Bastar Kanker /
- Sudin Jha @ Sudhin Jha v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
- Akhtar Parwez v. The State of West Bengal
- Kishore Kumar Singh v. The Bihar State Electricity Board
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.