Indian Evidence Act — Section 44
Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be
44. Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be
proved.––Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 40, 41 or 42, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
OPINIONS OF THIRD PERSONS WHEN RELEVANT
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 44
- Patna High Court 05 May 2026 — brhc010415382021_1_2026-05-05
- Punjab & Haryana High Court 27 Mar 2026 — phhc010363381995_1_2026-03-27
- Delhi High Court 19 Mar 2026 — dlhc010730492023_1_2026-03-19
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021071292025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021065942025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021057112025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021053732025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021047332025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc021005282025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020982852025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020973592025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020960782025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020960332025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020960052025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020959912025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020958672025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020957722025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020957222025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020947362025_1_2026-01-27
- Rajasthan High Court 27 Jan 2026 — rjhc020943442025_1_2026-01-27
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.