Indian Evidence Act — Section 136
Judge to decide as to admissibility of evidence
When either party proposes to give evidence of any fact, the Judge may ask the party proposing to give the evidence in what manner the alleged fact, if proved, would be relevant; and the Judge shall admit the evidence if he thinks that the fact, if proved, would be relevant, and not otherwise. If the fact proposed to be proved is one of which evidence is admissible only upon proof of some other fact, such last-mentioned fact must be proved before evidence is given of the fact first mentioned, unless the party undertakes to give proof of such fact, and the Court is satisfied with such undertaking. If the relevancy of one alleged fact depends upon another alleged fact being first proved, the Judge may, in his discretion, either permit evidence of the first fact to be given before the second fact is proved, or require evidence to be given of the second fact before evidence is given of the first fact.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 136
- JANABAI GANGARAM KENDRE v. VISHWANATH SHYAMRAO PHAD & Ors.
- State of H.P. v. Gulshana Devi
- Shekhar Nanavaty v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
- Krishan Kumar Kotvi v. Jasbinder Singh
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- RAVI MOHAN SHARMA v. C.B.I.
- Ratna Chatterjee v. Sovan Chatterjee
- APPEAL+.odt v. The State of Maharashtra
- Bechuram Bag v. The State of West Bengal
- Sanjeev Builders Private Limited, incorporated under v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Established under the provisions of Life
- Sheikhpura v. P.S. Raja Pakar, District
- H.N.Rai & Ors. v. Ajay Mohan & Ors.
- CR.RA/228/2007 v. SHAILENDRA KAMALKISHOR PANDE & 4
- STATE OF GUJARAT v. ASHULAL NANJI BISNOL
- Suranjan Pandey v. Bhagirath Adhikari
- Judgment · High Court
- Ranjit Kaur v. Jagir Kaur & Ors.
- Ram Kishan & Ors. v. Rameshwar
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Court
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.