Indian Contract Act — Section 73
Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract
When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach. Compensation for failure to discharge obligation resembling those created by contract.— When an obligation resembling those created by contract has been incurred and has not been discharged, any person injured by the failure to discharge it is entitled to receive the same compensation from the party in default, as if such person had contracted to discharge it and had broken his contract. Explanation.—In estimating the loss or damage arising from a breach of contract, the means which existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of the contract must be taken into account. Illustrations (a) A contracts to sell and deliver 50 maunds of saltpetre to B, at a certain price to be paid on delivery. A breaks his promise. B is entitled to receive from A, by way of compensation, the sum, if any, by which the contract price falls short of the price for which B might have obtained 50 maunds of saltpetre of like quality at the time when the saltpetre ought to have been delivered. (b) A hires B's ship to go to Bombay, and there takes on board, on the first of January, a cargo, which A is to provide, and to bring it to Calcutta, the freight to be paid when earned. B's ship does not go to Bombay, but A has opportunities of procuring suitable conveyance for the cargo upon terms as advantageous as those on which he had chartered the ship. A avails himself of those opportunities, but is put to trouble and expense in doing so. A is entitled to receive compensation from B in respect of such trouble and expense. (c) A contracts to buy of B, at a stated price, 50 maunds of rice, no time being fixed for delivery. A afterwards informs B that he will not accept the rice if tendered to him. B is entitled to receive from A, by way of compensation, the amount, if any, by which the contract price exceeds that which B can obtain for the rice at the time when A informs B that he will not accept it. (d) A contracts to buy B's ship for 60,000 rupees, but breaks his promise. A must pay to B, by way of compensation, the excess, if any, of the contract price over the price which B can obtain for the ship at the time of the breach of promise. (e) A, the owner of a boat, contracts with B to take a cargo of jute to Mirzapur, for sale at that place, starting on a specified day. The boat, owing to some avoidable cause, does not start at the time appointed, whereby the arrival of the cargo at Mirzapur is delayed beyond the time when it would have arrived if the boat had sailed according to the contract. After that date, and before the arrival of the cargo, the price of jute falls. The measure of the compensation payable to B by A is the difference between the price which B could have obtained for the cargo at Mirzapur at the time when it would have arrived if forwarded in due course, and its market price at the time when it actually arrived. (f) A contracts to repair B's house in a certain manner, and receives payment in advance. A repairs the house, but not according to contract. B is entitled to recover from A the cost of making the repairs conform to the contract. (g) A contracts to let his ship to B for a year, from the first of January, for a certain price. Freights rise, and, on the first of January, the hire obtainable for the ship is higher than the contract price. A breaks his promise. He must pay to B, by way of compensation, a stun equal to the difference between the contract price and the price for which B could hire a similar ship for a year on and from the fi
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 73
- Madrasreserved High Court · 2026
- Delhi High Court · 2026
- CANARA BANK v. NONE
- HC-KAR v. Intercontinental
- HC-KAR v. Intercontinental
- HC-KAR v. Intercontinental
- Versus – v. West District
- Versus – v. West District
- BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICAL LIMITED v. ANAND ENGINEERING LIMITED
- MADHYA BHARAT POWER CORPORATION LIMITED v. VOITH HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED
- BUDHIRAJA ELECTRICALS v. PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
- M/S SARVPRIYA SECURITIES PVT LTD v. M/S ANK HOTELS PVT LTD
- Kessels Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Neo Metalicks Limited
- Kessels Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Neo Metalicks Limited
- Orissa High Court · 2026
- M/S INDOGREEN INTERNATIONAL v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- ITD-ITD CEM JOINT VENTURE v. KOLKATA METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.
- WEST BENGAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRADING CORPORATION LTD. v. TRANS DAMODAR COAL MINING PVT. LTD.
- WEST BENGAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRADING CORPORATION LTD. v. TRANS DAMODAR COAL MINING PVT. LTD.
- The date when v. M/s Sri Balaji Metals And Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Through Raghav Lakhotia, Director
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.