Indian Contract Act — Section 52
Order of performance of reciprocal promises.—Where the order in which reciprocal promises
52.Order of performance of reciprocal promises.—Where the order in which reciprocal promises are to be performed is expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order; and where the order is not expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order which the nature of the transaction requires.
Illustrations
(a) A and B contract that A shall build a house for B at a fixed price. A’s promise to build the house must be performed
before B’s promise to pay for it.
(b) A and B contract that A shall make over his stock-in-trade to B at a fixed price, and B promises to give security for the payment of the money. A’s promise need not be performed until the security is given, for the nature of the transaction requires that A should have security before he delivers up his stock.
24
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 52
- AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
- AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
- SHAYNA v. Keshav Sahu
- Chief Engineer Metropolitan Transport Project (Railways), Southern Railway, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 v. Engineering Products (I) Limited
- Shashi Bala & Ors. v. NIDHI GUPTA, J
- Mehta, Solicitor General of India with Ms. Bani Dikshit, Mr. Samir Malik,Mr v. JINDAL ITF LIMITED & Anr.
- Mehta, Solicitor General of India with Ms. Bani Dikshit, Mr. Samir Malik,Mr v. JINDAL ITF LIMITED & Anr.
- K.S. Balachandra v. Smt. A.V. Anuradha
- PATHUMMAKUTTY v. KUNHAHAMMEDKUTTY
- RANJEET SINGH v. HARKESH MANUJA J. (ORAL)
- High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh · 2023
- High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh · 2023
- Baldev Singh v. Naresh Raina & Ors.
- State of Jharkhand v. Webel Technology Limited, having its registered Office at Webel Bhawan, Salt Lake
- M/S Kumar Constructio v. State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
- JEBUNISHA MAHMMAD MULLA v. RASHIDA IBRAHIM SHAIKH
- MIS CANARA LEASING LTD. v. SRI PRASHANTH K
- P. Velumani v. K.A. Noorjahan & Ors.
- NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. v. SIEMENS ATIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Judgment · High Court · 2009
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.