Indian Contract Act — Section 38
Effect of refusal to accept offer of performance.—Where a promisor has made an offer of
38. Effect of refusal to accept offer of performance.—Where a promisor has made an offer of performance to the promisee, and the offer has not been accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights under the contract.
Every such offer must fulfil the following conditions:—
(1) it must be unconditional;
(2) it must be made at a proper time and place, and under such circumstances that the person to whom it is made may have a reasonable opportunity of ascertaining that the person by whom it is made is able and willing there and then to do the whole of what he is bound by his promise to do;
(3) if the offer is an offer to deliver anything to the promisee, the promisee must have a reasonable opportunity of seeing that the thing offered is the thing which the promisor is bound by his promise to deliver.
An offer to one of several joint promisees has the same legal consequences as an offer to all of them.
21
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
Illustration
A contracts to deliver to B at his warehouse, on the 1st March, 1873, 100 bales of cotton of a particular quality. In order to make an offer of a performance with the effect stated in this section, A must bring the cotton to B’s warehouse, on the appointed day, under such circumstances that B may have areasonable opportunity of satisfying himself that the thing offered is cotton of the quality contracted for, and that there are 100 bales.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 38
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- Smt B. Lalitha v. Fi, Sreenivasa Nagar colonv' Bagh
- PATEL CHELABHAI BHAGVANBHAI DECED.THR'HEIRS v. MAFATLAL MULCHANDBHAI PATEL
- M/s. Gemini Communications Ltd. v. The Chief General Manager Southern Telecom Projects Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
- Guna Krishna Gauns & Ors. v. Antonio Joao Braganza alias Antush Braganza & Ors.
- PULLUR SERVICE CO-OPERTIVE BANK LTD v. CORNATION CURIES (P) LTD
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.