Indian Contract Act — Section 29
Agreements void for uncertainty.—Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable
29. Agreements void for uncertainty.—Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable
of being made certain, are void.
Illustrations
(a) A agrees to sell to B “a hundred tons of oil”. There is nothing whatever to show what kind of oil was intended. The
agreement is void for uncertainty.
(b) A agrees to sell to B one hundred tons of oil of a specified description, known as an article of commerce. There is no
uncertainty here to make the agreement void.
(c) A, who is a dealer in cocoanut-oil only, agrees to sell to B “one hundred tons of oil”. The nature of A’s trade affords an
indication of the meaning of the words, and A has entered into a contract for the sale of one hundred tons of cocoanut-oil.
(d) A agrees to sell to B “all the grain in my granary at Ramnagar”. There is no uncertainty here to make the agreement void.
(e) A agrees to sell B “one thousand maunds of rice at a price to be fixed by C”. As the price is capable of being made
certain, there is no uncertainty here to make the agreement void.
(f) A agrees to sell to B “my white horse for rupees five hundred or rupees one thousand”. There is nothing to show which of
the two prices was to be given. The agreement is void.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 29
- ITD-ITD CEM JOINT VENTURE v. KOLKATA METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.
- MEENA BAZAAR v. MOHAMMED AMIN ABUBAKER
- M/S ARLINGTON SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS LIMITED v. BHAWANI DASS AND ANOTHER
- Rsa No. 2320 of 2012 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2025
- MANZOOR AHMAD MIR & ANR. v. UT OF J&K & OTHERS
- Sunil Kumar Soni v. Ravindra Jaiswal And Ors. & Ors.
- The Managing Director v. M/s.Siemens Limited
- Shri Ashok Baishya v. M/S Orient Motors & Ors.
- M/S MODI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- M/S MODI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Himat Ram v. Devta Sh. Shyati Nag
- PRAKASH KUMAR THAKER v. THE JHARKHAND STATE CO-OPERATIVE LAC MARKETING AND PROCUREMENT FEDERATION LIMITED
- ABUL KALAM v. SHRI RAMEN SARMA
- Karimnagar District v. District
- Balasaheb v. Limbrao
- RAMANANDA VARAMBALLI v. AHALYA
- Shyam Kumar Inani v. Vinod Agrawal & Ors.
- Bharat Coking Coal Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act v. M/s. AT-Libra BPL (JV)
- A.L.Abdul KalamAzad v. A.L.Jawagarlal
- M/s.NLC India Limited v. M/s.Metro Machinery Traders
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.