Indian Contract Act — Section 24
Agreements void, if considerations and objects unlawful in part.—If any part of a single
24.Agreements void, if considerations and objects unlawful in part.—If any part of a single consideration for one or more objects, or any one or any part of any one of several considerations for a single object, is unlawful, the agreement is void.
Illustration
A promises to superintend, on behalf of B, a legal manufacture of indigo, and an illegal traffic in other articles. B promises to pay to A a salary of 10,000 rupees a year. The agreement is void, the object of A’s promise, and the consideration for B’s promise, being in part unlawful.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 24
- GURVINDER SINGH TOOR v. ROHIT MALHOTRA
- SUNITA SINHA v. M/S LEELA BUILDERS PVT. LTD.& ORS.
- MEENA BAZAAR v. MOHAMMED AMIN ABUBAKER
- Nayan Dutta v. Dr. K.K. Agrawal
- Rajesh .Potnuru,. .Aged 27 v. State of Telangana, Depa(ment of Labour, Reo bv princioal Secretarv to Government
- Madrasdated High Court · 2025
- Raja v. Indira
- Lv.a1ggpu.rqm General Financeand Leasing Ltd. v. Telangana
- Vikas Sharma v. Hemant Sharma & Ors.
- Vikas Sharma v. Hemant Sharma
- Vikas Sharma v. Hemant Sharma
- Vinoj Kumar Sharma v. State of H.P. & Ors.
- Vinoj Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. State of H.P. & Ors.
- M/s.NLC India Limited v. M/s.Metro Machinery Traders
- Shaun Automobiles Private Limited v. State Bank of India and others
- Shaun Automobiles Private Limited v. State Bank of India & Ors.
- Smt. Leimapokpam Ongbi Mema Devi v. The State of Manipur
- M/s Tata Consultancy Service Ltd and another v. Union of India
- M/s Tata Consultancy Service Ltd & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- SHIVANGI GUPTA v. NATIONAL LAW UNIVERISTY JODHPUR
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.