Indian Contract Act — Section 18
“Misrepresentation” defined.—“Misrepresentation” means and includes—
18. “Misrepresentation” defined.—“Misrepresentation” means and includes—
(1) the positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it,
of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true;
(2) any breach of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person committing it, or any one claiming under him; by misleading another to his prejudice, or to the prejudice of any one claiming under him;
(3) causing, however innocently, a party to an agreement, to make a mistake as to the substance
of the thing which is the subject of the agreement.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 18
- MEENA BAZAAR v. MOHAMMED AMIN ABUBAKER
- Veerasamy v. Jayalakshmi
- Social Leasing (India) Ltd. v. Rajan Kumar Kanthwal
- Abbas Ansari v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others
- Smt. Joyshree Dutta v. The State of West Bengal
- CHARANJIT SINGH v. V.K. CHABRA & ANR
- VISHALAKSHI BHAT v. SUNDER RAJAN M.K.
- DR. KRUTHI PRIYA. M v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- Globe Ground India Private Limited v. Airports Authority of India Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi
- NIRANJAN PIPALIA v. HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD.
- Prameela Gurung v. Urmila Manger & Ors
- The Central Bank of India & Anr. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors
- Konthoujam Paka Singh v. The State of Manipur & Ors.
- Hoshiyar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ku Chih Choi v. Central Bank of India & Ors.
- Ku Chih Choi v. Central Bank of India & Ors.
- S.R. Abdul Khadar v. Syndicate Bank
- Khaza Hakeemuddin v. Debts Recovery Tribunal
- Judgment · High Court · 2010
- AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.