Indian Contract Act — Section 133
Discharge of surety by variance in terms of contract
Any variance, made without the surety's consent, in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, discharges the surety as to transactions subsequent to the variance. Illustrations (a) A becomes surety to C for B's conduct as manager in C's bank. Afterwards, B and C contract, without A's consent, that B's salary shall be raised, and that he shall become liable for one-fourth of the losses on overdrafts. B allows a customer to over-draw, and the bank loses a sum of money. A is discharged from his suretyship by the variance made without his consent, and is not liable to make good this loss. (b) A guarantees C against the misconduct of B in an office to which B is appointed by C, and of which the duties are defined by an Act of the Legislature. By a subsequent Act, the nature of the office is materially altered. Afterwards, B misconducts himself. A is discharged by the change from future liability under his guarantee, though the misconduct of B is in respect of a duty not affected by the later Act. (c) C agrees to appoint B as his clerk to sell goods at a yearly salary, upon A's becoming surety to C for B's duly accounting for moneys received by him as such clerk. Afterwards, without A's knowledge or consent, C and B agree that B should be paid by a commission on the goods sold by him and not by a fixed salary. A is not liable for subsequent misconduct of B. (d) A gives to C a continuing guarantee to the extent of 3,0(X) rupees for any oil supplied by C to B on credit. Afterwards B becomes embarrassed, and, without the knowledge of A, B and C contract that C shall continue to supply B with oil for ready money, and that the payments shall be applied to the then, existing debts between B and C. A is not liable on his guarantee for any goods supplied after this new arrangement. (e) C contracts to lend B 5,000 rupees on the 1st March. A guarantees repayment. C pays the 5,000 rupees to B on the 1st January, A is discharged from his liability, as the contract has been varied, inasmuch as C might sue B for the money before the first of March.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 133
- Suraj Shriniwas Zanwar and Ors v. IDBI Bank Ltd and Ors
- MS. RITU GUPTA v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
- MS. RITU GUPTA v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
- MS. RITU GUPTA v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
- MS. RITU GUPTA v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
- OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY & Ors. v. Krish Spinning1
- Smt.P.Savitha Krishna Reddy, Wo.Sri.P.V.Krishna Reddy household v. Betweerr
- M/S. OLIVE LIFESCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
- LEMON ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & Ors.
- LEMON ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- Smt. Mohini Devi Agarwal v. Rashtriya Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd. Jaipur
- Smt. Alka Jalan v. Punjab National Bank
- M/S ARUNDATHI LABORATORIES LTD. v. SRI ARUN REDDY
- M/S INNOVATIVE STUDIOS PVT. LTD v. SHREE DHANVANTRI STEELS
- Deogiri Nagri Sahakari Bank Limited v. M/s. Powerup Electricals, Aurangabad
- M/s.Sundaram Finance Limited v. S.Sivakumar & Ors
- Pinax Paper Mills Private Limited v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
- Naveen Tukaram Sali v. The Mahad Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd.
- M/S TYAGI PIPE CRAFT PVT. LTD. v. M/S ASSET CARE ENTERPRISES LTD.
- The State Bank of India v. Vivek Garg
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.