Income Tax Act — Section 3
4[(c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is
3-4[(c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from the assessment year from which the registration is sought,]
and send a copy of such order to the trust or institution. (2) All applications, pending before the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner on which no order has been passed under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 12AA before the date on which this section has come into force, shall be deemed to be applications made under sub-clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A on that date. 5[(3) The order under sub-section (1) shall be passed, in such form and manner as may be prescribed, within a period of,--
(i) three months calculated from the end of the month in which the application was received in case of
clause (a);
(ii) six months calculated from the end of the quarter in which the application was received in case of sub-
clause (ii) of clause (b); and
(iii) one month calculated from the end of the month in which the application was received in case of
clause (c).]
6[(4) Where registration or provisional registration of a trust or an institution has been granted under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (1) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 12AA, as the case may be, and subsequently,—
(a) the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has noticed occurrence of one or more specified
violations during any previous year; or
(b) the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has received a reference from the Assessing Officer
under the second proviso to sub-section (3) of section 143 for any previous year; or
(c) such case has been selected in accordance with the risk management strategy, formulated by the Board
from time to time, for any previous year, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall,—
(i) call for such documents or information from the trust or institution, or make such inquiry as he thinks
necessary in order to satisfy himself about the occurrence or otherwise of any specified violation;
(ii) pass an order in writing, cancelling the registration of such trust or institution, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard, for such previous year and all subsequent previous years, if he is satisfied that one or more specified violations have taken place;
(iii) pass an order in writing, refusing to cancel the registration of such trust or institution, if he is not
satisfied about the occurrence of one or more specified violations;
(iv) forward a copy of the order under clause (ii) or clause (iii), as the case may be, to the Assessing Officer
and such trust or institution.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the following shall mean "specified violation",—
(a) where any income derived from property held under trust, wholly or in part for charitable or religious
purposes, has been applied, other than for the objects of the trust or institution; or
(b) the trust or institution has income from profits and gains of business which is not incidental to the attainment of its objectives or separate books of account are not maintained by such trust or institution in respect of the business which is incidental to the attainment of its objectives; or
(c) the trust or institution has applied any part of its income from the property held under a trust for private
religious purposes, which does not enure for the benefit of the public; or
(d) the trust or institution established for charitable purpose created or established after the commencement of this Act, has applied any part of its income for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste; or
(e) any activity being carried out by the trust or institution,—
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
(i) is not genuine; or (ii) is not being carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions subject to which it was
registered; or
(f) the trust or institution has not complied with the requirement of any other law, as referred to in item (B) of sub-clause (i) of clause (b) of sub-section (1), and the order, direction or decree, by whatever name called, holding that such non-compliance has occurred, has either not been disputed or has attained finality 7[; or]
7[(g) the application referred to in clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A is not complete or it
contains false or incorrect information.]
(5) The order under clause (ii) or clause (iii) of sub-section (4), as the case may be, shall be passed before the expiry of a period of six months, calculated from the end of the quarter in which the first notice is issued by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on or after the 1st day of April, 2022, calling for any document or information, or for making any inquiry, under clause (i) of sub-section (4).]
_________________________________________________
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 3
- Vimal @ Bittu Sahu v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
- Judgment · High Court · 2026
- Murarkar Janardhan v. State of Telangana
- Adabala Kumari @ Sabbi Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK v. National Faceless Assessment Centre
- Omkar Suresh Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Ujwal Singh @ Ujjwal Singh v. The State of Jharkhand
- Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar
- Ankit Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
- Ankit Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan
- Ankit Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan
- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6688/2025 v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7387/2025
- Ankit Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan
- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6688/2025 v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7387/2025
- Ankit Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan
- Jharkhand High Court · 2025
- Monu v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
- Mohd. Abdul Ayaz v. The State of Telanga
- X (Juvenile ) Thru. His Father v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And 3 Others
- Akhtar Ali @ Ali Akhtar @ Shamim @ Raja Ustad v. State of Uttarakhand
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.