Income Tax Act — Section 276B
If a person fails to 37[***],—
276B. If a person fails to 37[***],—
(a) 38[pay to the credit of the Central Government, the tax deducted] at source by him as required by or
under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or
39[(b) pay tax or ensure payment of tax to the credit of the Central Government, as required by or under—
(i) sub-section (2) of section 115-O; (ii) the proviso to section 194B; (iii) the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 194R; (iv) the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 194S; or]
40[(v) sub-section (2) of section 194BA,]
he shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to seven years and with fine: 41[Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply if the payment referred to in clause (a) has been made to the credit of the Central Government at any time on or before the time prescribed for filing the statement for such payment under sub-section (3) of section 200.]
_________________________________________________
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 276B
- MR. BALAJI BHAT v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- Jyotsana Investments Company Limited v. R. K. De
- THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT v. M/S ELIXIR ENTERPRISES AND HOTELS PVT LTD
- THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT v. M/S ELIXIR ENTERPRISES AND HOTELS PVT LTD
- THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT v. M/S ELIXIR ENTERPRISES AND HOTELS PVT LTD
- DR MANOJ KHANNA v. INCOME TAX OFFICE
- INCOME TAX OFFICER v. BAL KISHAN JHA
- Delhi High Court · 2025
- Mr. Vipul Agrawal SSC & Ors. v. BAL KISHAN JHA
- Supreme Court · 2025
- M/S. CENTURY JOINT DEVELOPMENTS PVT LTD v. SRI MAHESH PRABHU A
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 73(2) NEW DELHI v. CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD & Anr.
- INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 73(2) NEW DELHI v. CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD & Anr.
- INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 73(2) NEW DELHI v. CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD & Anr.
- M/s SKS MC Joint Venture having its office at Ashok Kunj, Opposite v. The State of Jharkhand
- M/s SKS MC Joint Venture having its office at Ashok Kunj, Opposite v. The State of Jharkhand
- M/s SKS MC Joint Venture having its office at Ashok Kunj, Opposite v. The State of Jharkhand
- Rishikesh Subodh Sapre v. Union of India
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.