Income Tax Act — Section 264
(1) In the case of any order other than an order to which section 263 applies passed by an authority
264. (1) In the case of any order other than an order to which section 263 applies passed by an authority subordinate to him, the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, either of his own motion or on an application by the assessee for revision, call for the record of any proceeding under this Act in which any such order has been passed and may make such inquiry or cause such inquiry to be made and, subject to the provisions of this Act, may pass such order thereon, not being an order prejudicial to the assessee, as he thinks fit. (2) The Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall not of his own motion revise any order under this section if the order has been made more than one year previously. (3) In the case of an application for revision under this section by the assessee, the application must be made within one year from the date on which the order in question was communicated to him or the date on which he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier : Provided that the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, if he is satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within that period, admit an application made after the expiry of that period. (4) The Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall not revise any order under this section in the following cases—
(a) where an appeal against the order lies to the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or to 84[the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or] the Commissioner (Appeals) or to the Appellate Tribunal but has not been made and the time within which such appeal may be made has not expired, or, in the case of an appeal to 84[the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or] the Commissioner (Appeals) or to the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee has not waived his right of appeal; or
(b) where the order is pending on an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals); or (c) where the order has been made the subject of an appeal to 84[the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or] the
Commissioner (Appeals) or to the Appellate Tribunal.
(5) Every application by an assessee for revision under this section shall be accompanied by a fee of five hundred rupees. (6) On every application by an assessee for revision under this sub-section, made on or after the 1st day of October, 1998, an order shall be passed within one year from the end of the financial year in which such application is made by the assessee for revision. Explanation.—In computing the period of limitation for the purposes of this sub-section, the time taken in giving an opportunity to the assessee to be re-heard under the proviso to section 129 and any period during which any proceeding under this section is stayed by an order or injunction of any court shall be excluded.
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (6), an order in revision under sub-section (6) may be passed at any time in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in an order of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court or the Supreme Court. Explanation 1.—An order by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner declining to interfere shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed not to be an order prejudicial to the assessee. Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) shall be deemed to be an authority subordinate to the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.
_________________________________________________
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 264
- Delhi High Court · 2026
- Delhi High Court · 2026
- ECO Protection Engineers Private Limited v. Central Board of Direct Taxes
- Baskaran Ganesan v. The Commissioner Income Tax, International Taxation
- M/S LG ELECTRONICS INDIA P.LTD & ANR v. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) & ANR
- QUALYS INC v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- QUALYS INC v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED v. THE DEPUT
- Benteler Automative (China) Investment Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (IT), Circle-1, Pune
- CROWN ELECTROMECHANICAL PVT LTD. v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – 1 AND ORS.
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- M/s DRS Logistics Private Limited v. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
- BRAY CONTROLS SOUTH EAST ASIA PTE LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 1 & ANR
- Murugan Karuppaiya,2-152 Jamin Muthur, Pollachi, Coimbatore 642 005 v. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Coimbatore-1, Coimbatore
- M/S KARNATAKA SOAPS AND DETERGENTS LTD v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT
- MANJEET SINGH CHAWLA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TDS
- MEHMOOD ASKARI v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CENTRAL
- MEHMOOD ASKARI v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI
- M/s.Coromondel Cabeles P. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle – I (3), Chennai
- SANJAY SOMANY v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.